ارزیابی خطر سیلاب با استفاده از سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی رویکردی نوین در مدیریت بحران (موردمطالعه: روستاهای شهرستان نیشابور)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

چکیده

سیلاب به‌عنوان یکی از مخرب‌ترین بلایای طبیعی، سالانه خسارات جانی و مالی قابل‌توجهی به ۴۰۰ روستای دارای سکنه شهرستان نیشابور وارد می‌کند. این شهرستان به دلیل موقعیت جغرافیایی خاص، توپوگرافی متنوع و تغییرات کاربری اراضی، همواره در معرض خطر سیلاب‌های ویرانگر قرار داشته است. این پژوهش با هدف ارزیابی خطر سیلاب در سطح روستاهای منطقه، از تلفیق سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی (GIS) و الگوریتم گرادیان بوستینگ استفاده کرده است. داده‌های مورد بررسی شامل هفت شاخص اصلی (ارتفاع، شیب، جهت شیب، بارش، فاصله از آبراهه، زمین‌شناسی و کاربری اراضی) بودند که از منابع مختلفی همچون مدل رقومی ارتفاع (DEM)، تصاویر ماهواره‌ای و داده‌های هواشناسی استخراج شدند. نتایج نشان داد که عوامل توپوگرافی (با ۷۷ درصد اهمیت) و بارش (۶۱ درصد) بیشترین تأثیر را در مدل پیش‌بینی خطر سیلاب در میان روستاها داشته‌اند. همچنین، پهنه‌بندی خطر سیلاب در پنج کلاس انجام شد که حدود ۲۰ درصد از روستاهای شهرستان (۸۰ روستا) در کلاس خطر "بحرانی" قرار گرفتند. این روستاها عمدتاً در ارتفاعات کم، نزدیک به آبراهه‌ها و با پوشش گیاهی ضعیف واقع شده‌اند. ارزیابی عملکرد مدل نیز با معیارهای ضریب کاپا 91/0و خطای مربعات 19/0 نشان‌دهنده دقت بالای مدل در پیش‌بینی روستاهای پرخطر بود. یافته‌های این مطالعه می‌تواند به برنامه‌ریزان و مدیران کمک کند تا با شناسایی ۲۲۰ روستای واقع در کلاس‌های بحرانی و پرخطر، تدوین برنامه‌های کاهش ریسک و مدیریت بهینه کاربری اراضی، خسارات ناشی از سیلاب را به حداقل برسانند. این پژوهش همچنین اثربخشی روش‌های ترکیبی یادگیری ماشین و GIS را در ارزیابی مخاطرات طبیعی در سطح روستاهای شهرستان نیشابور نشان می‌دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Flood Risk Assessment Using Geographic Information Systems: A Novel Approach to Crisis Management (Case Study: Villages of Neyshabur County)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Hadi Tayebnia 1
  • iman shahnavazi 2
1 Associate Professor of Geography and Rural Planning, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
2 Master's Student, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction


Hydro-meteorological hazards, particularly floods, constitute a profound threat to rural environments, disproportionately affecting agricultural livelihoods, infrastructure, and human life. In the context of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and rural spatial planning, accurate flood susceptibility mapping is an imperative prerequisite for mitigating vulnerabilities. Neyshabur County, characterized by a complex topographic configuration and intricate hydrological networks, frequently experiences catastrophic inundations. Despite the escalating frequency of extreme precipitation events driven by climate variability, micro-level hazard zoning for the county’s rural settlements remains critically underdeveloped. Consequently, existing crisis management frameworks lack the granular spatial intelligence required for proactive intervention. To bridge this epistemological and operational gap, this study introduces a robust methodological framework integrating Geographic Information Systems (GIS) with advanced ensemble machine learning—specifically the Gradient Boosting (GB) algorithm. By localizing multi-criteria evaluation metrics to the geomorphological realities of Neyshabur, this research aims to precisely delineate flood-prone rural territories, thereby providing empirical foundations for sustainable rural planning, spatial resilience, and strategic crisis management.
 

Methodology

This research adopts an applied, descriptive-analytical paradigm, synthesizing extensive documentary, geospatial, and empirical field data. The methodological architecture is predicated on evaluating spatial vulnerability across rural settlements using seven geo-environmental and hydrological indicators: elevation, slope, aspect, precipitation distribution, proximity to waterways, geological formations, and land-use typologies. High-resolution spatial datasets were procured from diverse authoritative sources, including Digital Elevation Models (DEM) derived from ALOS PALSAR, multispectral satellite imagery from Sentinel-2, empirical data from regional meteorological stations, and standard geological maps. To model flood susceptibility, the Gradient Boosting algorithm was selected due to its exceptional predictive accuracy in handling non-linear, multi-dimensional spatial datasets. The computational workflow commenced with rigorous data normalization, followed by partitioning the dataset into a 70% training subset and a 30% validation subset. Hyperparameter optimization was systematically executed utilizing a Grid Search cross-validation technique to maximize model generalization. The predictive efficacy and robust classification capabilities of the algorithm were empirically evaluated using standardized metrics, including Precision, Recall, Cohen’s Kappa coefficient, and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). Furthermore, a Feature Importance analysis was embedded within the model to quantify the hierarchical influence of the localized independent variables on flood occurrence.
 

Findings

The spatial application of the Gradient Boosting model yielded highly precise flood hazard zonations across the study area. Predictive performance metrics validated the model’s exceptional reliability, registering a Kappa coefficient of 0.91and an RMSE of 0.19. The vulnerability assessment of rural settlements revealed alarming exposure levels: out of the analyzed settlements, 80 villages (comprising 20% of the total) are situated in “critical” hazard zones, while an additional 140 villages (35%) are located in “high-risk” zones. Consequently, a staggering 55% of the rural settlements in Neyshabur County are critically exposed to severe flood threats. Spatial correlations extracted from the model demonstrated that settlements situated within a <200 meter radius of primary waterways historically sustained the most devastating structural and economic damages due to rapid inundation. The Feature Importance analysis elucidated that topographical attributes (specifically elevation and slope) and precipitation intensity are the primary causative drivers of flood susceptibility. Anthropogenic land-use configurations and proximity to the hydrological network ranked as the most significant secondary determinants, highlighting the detrimental impact of unregulated rural encroachment into natural floodplains.
 

Discussion and Conclusion

The findings of this study unequivocally demonstrate that the convergence of topographical predisposition and unsustainable land-use practices has drastically amplified flood risks in the rural landscapes of Neyshabur County. The hybrid GIS and Gradient Boosting approach proved highly efficacious in identifying spatial vulnerabilities, offering a paradigm shift from reactive to proactive disaster management. The concentration of 55% of rural settlements in high to critical hazard zones necessitates immediate recalibration of regional rural planning policies. From a spatial planning perspective, it is evident that historical expansion patterns have severely encroached upon riparian buffer zones. To foster systemic resilience, it is strongly recommended that a statutory, non-negotiable safety buffer of at least 500 meters from major rivers and ephemeral waterways be institutionalized for all future rural development, infrastructure provisioning, and post-disaster reconstruction efforts. Furthermore, policymakers must prioritize the 80 critical-class villages for immediate structural interventions, including the construction of hydrological retention systems, ecological restoration of upstream watersheds, and the implementation of community-based early warning systems. Ultimately, integrating localized machine learning predictions into municipal master plans will empower rural planners to optimize land-use allocation, mitigate environmental hazards, and safeguard the socio-economic fabric of vulnerable rural communities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Flood
  • Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
  • Gradient Boosting
  • Hazard Zoning
  • Neyshabur County
حجازی، اسدالله.، نگهبان، سعید.، موسوی، سیده معصومه.، امین زاده، محمدهادی. (1403). بررسی و پهنه‌بندی خطر سیلاب حوضه‌های آبریز شهری با استفاده از مدل‌های فازی ویکور و روش خطی وزنی (مطالعه موردی: حوضه آبریز ایذه - خوزستان). پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمی، 13(2)، 51-70. doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2024.452640.1499
حساس، حمید.، عزیزیان، ابوالفضل.، قاسمی، محسن. (1399). ارائه یک مدل ساده برای تعیین مناطق در خطر سیل. مخاطرات محیط طبیعی، 9(25)، 81-100. doi: 10. 2111/jneh.2020.31011.1549
خالدی، شهریار.، فرهمند، قاسم.، علی بخشی، افسانه. (1400). تحلیل و پهنه‌بندی آسیب پذیری مخاطرات طبیعی (سیل و زلزله) ژئومورفولوژیکی استان کرمانشاه. مطالعات توسعه پایدار شهری و منطقه­ای، 2(1)، 17-36. https://www.srds.ir/article_132471.html
رضایی مقدم، محمدحسین.، رحیم پور، توحید. (1403). ارزیابی پتانسیل خطر وقوع سیلاب با استفاده از روش تحلیل آماری دو متغیره (مطالعه موردی: حوضه آبریز آجی­چای). پژوهش‌های ژئومورفولوژی کمی، 12(4)، 91-107. doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2024.429929.1473
زارعی، سعید.، کشاورز، سعیده. (1403). پهنه‌بندی خطر سیل در مناطق خشک با استفاده از مدل ترکیبی AHP-FUZZY در شهرستان دشتی، جنوب ایران. خشک بوم، 14(1)، 47-60. doi: 10.29252/aridbiom.2024.21525.2011
عابدینی، موسی.، فعال نذیری، مهدی.، پیروزی، الناز. (1402). ارزیابی و پهنه‌بندی خطر سیلاب با استفاده از تکنیک چند معیاره آراس و هیدروگراف واحد (مطالعه‌ی موردی: حوضه بالادست ایستگاه هیدرومتری پل سلطان مشکین‌شهر). مخاطرات محیط طبیعی، 12(35)، 115-138. https://jneh.usb.ac.ir/article_7101.html
عزمی، آئیژ.، نوری، مجتبی. (1396). نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در مدیریت مخاطرات طبیعی در سکونتگاه‌های روستایی (مطالعه موردی: بخش ماهیدشت کرمانشاه). جغرافیا (برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای)، 7(26)، 77-89. https://www.jgeoqeshm.ir/article_49635.html
مختاری، داود. (1385). جایگاه ژئومورفولوژی در ارزیابی بلایای طبیعی و مقابله با آنها در ایران. جغرافیایی سرزمین، 3(1)، 53-67. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/487485
مرکز تحقیقات آب و محیط زیست نیشابور. (1403). گزارش جامع سیلاب‌های شهرستان نیشابور و راهکارهای کاهش خسارت. انتشارات دانشگاه نیشابور.
Top of Form
References
Abedini, M., Faal Naziri, M., & Pirouzi, A. (2023). Flood risk assessment and zoning using multi-criteria ARAS technique and single hydrograph (Case study: Upstream basin of Soltan Meshkinshahr Bridge hydrometric station). Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 12(35), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2022.40684.1863 [In Persian]
Ahern, M., Kovats, R. S., Wilkinson, P., Few, R., & Matthies, F. (2005). Global health impacts of floods: Epidemiologic evidence. Epidemiologic Reviews, 27(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxi004
Ayan, S., Fleischmanna, J., Paulo, F., Brêdaa, C., Rudorffb, R., Cauduro, D., Paivaa, W., Collischonna, F., Papacd, M., & Moreira, R. (2021). Earth observation for flood applications: Progress and perspectives. In Earth observation (Chap. 4, River flood modeling and remote sensing across scales, pp. 61–103).
Azmi, A., & Nouri, M. (2017). The role of social capital in the management of natural hazards in rural settlements (Case study: Kermanshah Mahidasht). Geography (Regional Planning), 7(26), 77–89. https://www.jgeoqeshm.ir/article_49635.html [In Persian]
Boughton, G. (1998). The community: Central to emergency risk management. Australian Journal of Emergency Management.
Brendle, A. M. (2002). A vulnerability assessment of the Spring Creek watershed of Centre County, Pennsylvania (Master’s thesis, Pennsylvania State University, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Department of Geography).
Davies, T., Davies, R. H., & Alistair, J. (2018). Increasing communities’ resilience to disasters: An impact-based approach. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 743–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.026
Davis, I. (2008). Community disaster risk management (CDRM). In 3rd International Conference on Integrated Natural Disaster Management.
DFID. (2005). Natural disaster and disaster risk reduction measures: A desk review of costs and benefits. Environmental Resources Management (ERM); Government of the United Kingdom.
Doocy, S., Daniels, A., Packer, C., Dick, A., & Kirsch, T. D. (2013). The human impact of earthquakes: A historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLOS Currents, 5, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.67bd14fe457f1db0b5433a8ee20fb833
Farhan, Y., & Ayed, A. (2017). Assessment of flash-flood hazard in arid watersheds of Jordan. Journal of Geographic Information System, 9(6), 710–720. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2017.96045
Feng, L. H., & Lu, J. (2010). The practical research on flood forecasting based on artificial neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2974–2977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.037
Freeman, P., Martin, L., Bayer, J., Mechler, R., Saldana-Zorrilla, S., Warner, K., & Pflug, G. (2002). National system for comprehensive disaster management, Phase 2: Financing reconstruction. German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD).
Hassas, H., Azizian, A., & Ghasemi, M. (2020). A simple model for determining flood hazard areas. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 9(25), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2020.31011.1549 [In Persian]
Hejazi, A., Negahban, S., Mousavi, M., & Aminzadeh, M. (2024). Assessment and mapping of urban watershed flood by using fuzzy VIKOR and weighted linear combine models (Case study: Catchment Izeh–Khuzestan). Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 13(2), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.22034/gmpj.2024.452640.1499 [In Persian]
Hewitt, K. (1997). Interpretations of calamity: From the viewpoint of human ecology. Allen & Unwin.
Jahangir, M. H., Reineh, S. M. M., & Abolghasemi, M. (2019). Spatial predication of flood zonation mapping in Kan River Watershed, Iran, using artificial neural network algorithm. Weather and Climate Extremes, 25, Article 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2019.100215
Jigyasu, R. (2002). Reducing disaster vulnerability through local knowledge and capacity: The case of earthquake-prone rural communities in India and Nepal. Department of Town and Regional Planning, Trondheim.
Khaledi, S., Farahmand, G., & Ali Bakhshi, A. (2021). Vulnerability analysis and zoning of natural geomorphological hazards (Flood and earthquake) of Kermanshah province. Journal of Sustainable Urban & Regional Development Studies, 2(1), 17–36. https://www.srds.ir/article_132471.html [In Persian]
Mokhtari, D. (2006). The role of geomorphology in assessing and dealing with natural disasters in Iran. Geography of the Land, 3(1), 53–67. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/487485 [In Persian]
Neyshabur Water and Environment Research Center. (2024). Comprehensive report on floods in Neyshabur city and damage reduction strategies. Neyshabur University Publications. [In Persian]
Pascacio, E. D., Argueta, A. O., Mercedes, M., Uzcanga, C., & Marcial, N. R. (2018). Influence of land use on the riparian zone condition along an urban-rural gradient on the Sabinal River, Mexico. Botanical Sciences, 96(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1858
Rezayi Moghadam, M. H., & Rahimpour, T. (2024). Evaluating flood hazard potential using bivariate statistical analysis method (Case study: Aji Chai Basin). Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 12(4), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.22034/gmpj.2024.429929.1473 [In Persian]
Rinat, Y., Marra, F., Zoccatelli, D., & Morin, E. (2018). Controls of flash flood peak discharge in Mediterranean basins and the special role of runoff-contributing areas. Journal of Hydrology, 565, 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.055
Smith, K. (2013). Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge.
Sowmya, K., John, C., & Shrivasthava, N. (2015). Urban flood vulnerability zoning of Cochin City, southwest coast of India, using remote sensing and GIS. Natural Hazards, 75(2), 1271–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1372-4
Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2014). Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 512, 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.008
Trim, P. R. J. (2004). An integrative approach to disaster management and planning. Disaster Prevention and Management, 13(3), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560410541812
Trondheim, R. J. (2002). Reducing disaster vulnerability through local knowledge and capacity: The case of earthquake-prone rural communities in India and Nepal (Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and Fine Art, Department of Town and Regional Planning).
Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Hovelsrud-Broda, G. K., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Mathiesen, S., Naylor, R., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., Schiller, A., Selin, H., & Tyler, N. (2003). Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8080–8085. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231334100
UN/ISDR. (2007). Terminology: Basic terms of disaster risk reduction. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.
UNDP. (1997). Capacity development (Technical Advisory Paper No. 2). United Nations Development Programme.
United Nations Climate. (2015). The human cost of weather-related disasters 1995–2015.
Wisner, B. (2005). Tracking vulnerability: History, use, potential and limitations of a concept. In SIDA & Stockholm University Research Conference.
Yamin, F., Rahman, A., & Huq, S. (2005). Vulnerability, adaptation and climate disasters: A conceptual overview. IDS Bulletin, 36(4), 60–75.
Youssef, A. M., Pradhan, B., & Hassan, A. M. (2011). Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine Road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS-based morphometry and satellite imagery. Environmental Earth Sciences, 62(3), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0551-1
Zarei, S., & Keshavarz, S. (2024). Flood hazard zoning in dry areas, using AHP-fuzzy model in Dashti region, south Iran. Journal of Arid Biome, 14(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.29252/aridbiom.2024.21525.2011 [In Persian]