نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری،گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران
2 استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Introduction
The development of economic activities and the diversification of production activities in rural areas lead to an increase in investment, production at the village level, and ultimately the sustainability of the rural economy.Capacity building in rural areas means creating strong relationships and a series of steps through which members of the rural community can present their opinions on a series of measures and act on them, and also means increasing the ability to set goals and implement specific measures in rural development plans, or having a strong and common power in response to the limitations of existing resources, which creates an enabling environment with specific and legitimate policies and frameworks for rural communities. The present study analyzes economic linkages in the agricultural, industrial, and service sectors by utilizing existing capacities.
Methodology
The present study analyzes economic linkages in the agricultural, industrial and service sectors by utilizing existing capacities.The research method is descriptive-analytical and of an applied type. Library and survey studies were used to collect information.The statistical population included rural household heads in 18 villages of Razavieh district with 303 people and the opinions of 26 experts in the region were questioned.SPSS, SMART (PLS) and GIS software were used for analysis.
Findings
Local (general) capacities in the villages of Shourak Saburi with 2.5 and Derakht Bid, Qeshlaq and Dehne Chehel with a score of 2.6 have the lowest score and Miami villages with an average of 3 and Jim Abad with an average of 2.9 have the highest score. Economic capacities in Jim Abad village with an average of 3.2 have the highest score. In general, the villages studied are below the average level of 3 in terms of economic capacities (agricultural development, industrial revival and complementary activities). In terms of economic linkages, Jim Abad village with an average of 3.6 has the highest and Dehne Chehel village with an average of 2.5 has the lowest economic linkages. In this region, economic linkages (production and city-rural linkages) with an average level of 3.1 are relatively desirable at an average to high level. According to the one-way analysis of variance test, the average difference between general capacities and economic capacities with economic linkages is significant. Therefore, the results of the Tukey test show that from the perspective of households (general capacities) there is a significant difference between the average economic linkages (production linkages and urban-rural linkages) in villages with high capacity and villages with low capacity. (sig=0.015) Accordingly, villages with high capacity have -0.763 units of the average less economic linkages than villages with low capacity From the perspective of experts (economic capacities) there is a significant difference between the average economic linkages in villages with high capacity and villages with medium capacity. (sig=0.02) Accordingly, villages with high capacity have 0.437 units of the average more economic linkages than villages with medium capacity. To examine the effect of local capacities (agricultural development, complementary activities, industrial revival) on economic linkages in Razavieh district of Mashhad, the PLS structural equation model was used. To assess the reliability of the model, the combined reliability and Cronbach's alpha were examined. The reliability rate is more than 0.7 in all variables. The T values between complementary activities with economic links (2.053) and between agricultural development with industrial revival (2.35) are obtained with 95% confidence. Between agricultural development with economic links (11.06) and agricultural development with complementary activities (16.45) are confirmed with 99% confidence in the sample population.The T values of the industrial revival with economic links are (0.718), which means that the effect of industrial revival on economic links is low.
Discussion and Conclusion
he results show that general and economic capacities are not in a desirable state according to the evaluation of the indicators.The results of examining the difference in the relationships between the two averages between the three levels of capacities in relation to economic linkages showed that high general capacities did not play a role in the richness of economic linkages. While high economic capacities have led to stronger economic linkages. In order to measure the impact of economic capacities on economic linkages, a structural equation model has been used.Therefore, the agricultural development variable with a coefficient of determination of 0.956 has had the greatest impact on economic linkages.Also, the value of 2R shows that 93.4 percent of economic linkages are explained by agricultural development, industrial revitalization, and complementary activities. Therefore, the impact of economic capacities on economic linkages is strong.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)