تحلیل نگرش کنشگران کلیدی از عوامل موثر بر ناپایداری توسعه مسکن روستایی (مورد مطالعه: روستاهای حاشیه زاینده‌رود فلاورجان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، گروه جغرافیای انسانی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

4 استاد گروه معماری و عضو هسته پژوهشی معماری روستایی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

بهبود وضعیت مسکن روستایی و کاهش عوامل ناپایداری مسکن می‌تواند به بهبود کیفیت زندگی و توسعه پایدار کمک کند. پژوهش حاضر از لحاظ هدف، کاربردی و از نظر شیوه انجام از نوع ترکیبی (کمی و کیفی) است. در این پژوهش عوامل تاثیرگذار در ناپایداری مسکن روستاهای حاشیه زاینده‌رود شهرستان فلاورجان مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. مشارکت‌کننده‌گان در پژوهش، خبرگان و کنشگران صاحب‌نظر در 21 روستا حاشیه رودخانه زاینده‌رود، سطح شهرستان فلاورجان و استان اصفهان هستند که به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. اشباع نظری با تعداد 30 نفر محقق شد. برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، از فن مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختارمند استفاده شد. در نهایت از بین عوامل (کشف شده)، پس از پالایش و دسته‌بندی 37 عامل کلیدی ناپایداری مسکن انتخاب گردید و گویه‌های استخراج شده با بهره‌گیری از روش کیو اولویت‌بندی و داده‌های جمع‌آوری شده در نرم افزار  Kadeبا روش تحلیل مولفه‌های اصلی PCA و چرخش واریماکس مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. بر اساس یافته‌های تحقیق، این نتیجه حاصل شد که چهار نوع دیدگاه متفاوت در ارتباط با عوامل ناپایداری مسکن روستایی وجود دارد. گروه دانشگاهیان (با اکثریت اعضای هیات علمی) بر عوامل حاکمیت بوروکراسی در دریافت تسهیلات و خدمات و ضعف بسترسازی برای دسترسی به بیمه تضمین کیفیت در صنعت ساختمان، گروه کارشناسان اجرایی (با اکثریت تحصیل کردگان) بر عامل افزایش هزینه ساخت مسکن، گروه دیپلمه‌های جامعه محلی و پژوهشگران بر عامل افزایش بی‌رویه هزینه ساخت مسکن و در نهایت گروه تحصیل کردگان جامعه محلی بر طولانی بودن زمان ارائه خدمات توسط دستگاه‌های متولی و افزایش هزینه‌های ساخت مسکن تاکید داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing The Attitude of Key Actors on The Factors Affecting the Instability of Rural Housing Development (Case: Villages In Zayanderood River Basin Villages)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zohreh Sadeghi 1
  • Farhad Azizpour 2
  • Asghar Tahmasebi 3
  • Mohsen Sartipipour 4
1 Phd Student of Geography and Rural Planning, Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associated Prof. in Geography and Rural Planning, Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Prof. in Geography and Rural Planning, Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4 Professor in Architecture, Department of Architecture, Member of the rural architecture research core, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction:
Housing is not just a physical structure; it is a fundamental aspect of human well-being and social stability. In rural areas, housing conditions are closely linked to various socio-economic factors, including income levels, employment opportunities, access to services, and community cohesion. Housing is a cornerstone of sustainable development and a critical determinant of quality of life. In Iran, rural housing has been a focal point of rural development initiatives for several decades, particularly since the establishment of a centralized rural development system. These initiatives have been implemented through various rural executive plans. Despite these efforts, rural housing in Iran is undergoing significant changes and irregularities. In the other words, rural housing has been a critical component of national development policies, reflecting the government's commitment to improving living standards in rural areas. However, the effectiveness of these policies has been mixed, with many rural communities still facing significant challenges related to housing stability and quality. Understanding the factors contributing to housing instability is essential for developing a logical understanding and analysis of sustainable rural housing dynamics. This knowledge is invaluable for housing managers and planners to predict future trends and manage housing efficiently. Previous studies have not sufficiently explored the attitudes of local actors regarding the challenges of rural housing. This study aims to identify and analyze the underlying factors of housing instability in rural areas from the perspective of local experts and rural elites in the villages along the Zayandeh River in Flowerjan County.
 
Methodology:
This research employs a mixed-methods approach, integrating both quantitative and qualitative techniques. The study's participants include local experts and rural elites from 20 villages in the Zayandeh River basin, within Flowerjan County in Isfahan province. Participants were selected using a purposeful sampling method, achieving theoretical saturation with 30 individuals. Data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews, allowing for an in-depth exploration of the factors influencing housing instability. This approach ensured a comprehensive understanding of the various perspectives and experiences of the participants.
The mixed-methods approach is particularly well-suited for this study because it allows for the triangulation of data, enhancing the validity and reliability of the findings. By combining quantitative and qualitative data, the research can capture the complexity of housing instability and provide a more nuanced understanding of the underlying factors. The semi-structured interviews were designed to elicit detailed responses from participants, enabling the researchers to explore the nuances of their experiences and perspectives.
The collected data were meticulously refined and categorized, resulting in the identification of 37 key factors contributing to housing instability. These factors were prioritized using the Q method, a technique that allows for the systematic study of subjectivity. The data were then analyzed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and varimax rotation within the Q Methodology software. This analytical process helped to distill the complex data into clear, actionable insights. The Q method is particularly useful for this type of research because it allows for the identification of distinct viewpoints among participants. By prioritizing the factors contributing to housing instability, the researchers were able to identify common themes and patterns in the data. The use of PCA and varimax rotation further refined the analysis, ensuring that the findings were robust and reliable.
 
Findings:
The analysis revealed four distinct perspectives on the factors affecting rural housing instability:
Academic Perspective: Predominantly held by faculty members, this group emphasized issues related to bureaucratic governance in accessing facilities and services, and the weak foundation for quality assurance in the construction industry. They highlighted the need for more robust regulatory frameworks and better enforcement of construction standards to ensure the durability and safety of rural housing. This perspective underscores the importance of institutional support and effective governance in addressing housing instability.
Executive Experts' Perspective: Comprised mainly of educated individuals, this group highlighted the increasing costs of housing construction as a significant factor. They pointed out that inflation and rising material costs are making it increasingly difficult for rural residents to afford new housing or maintain existing structures. This perspective draws attention to the economic challenges faced by rural communities and the need for targeted interventions to address these issues.
Local Community and Researchers' Perspective: This group, including diploma holders, stressed the excessive rise in housing construction costs. They also noted the impact of economic instability on housing affordability and the challenges faced by rural families in securing financing for housing projects. This perspective highlights the broader economic context in which housing instability occurs and the need for comprehensive economic policies to support rural development.
Educated Local Community's Perspective: This group pointed to the prolonged service delivery times by trustees and the escalating costs of housing construction as critical issues. They emphasized the need for more efficient service delivery and better support systems to help rural residents navigate the complexities of housing construction and maintenance. This perspective underscores the importance of effective service delivery and the role of local institutions in supporting housing stability.

 
Discussion and Conclusion:
The study concludes that the increasing cost of rural residence in the study area is the main challenge to rural housing stability, as highlighted by all local actors. To address this issue, the study recommends facilitating access to low-cost construction materials and improving access to rural housing services and infrastructure. These interventions are essential for improving rural housing conditions and supporting sustainable rural development. By addressing the economic and bureaucratic barriers to housing stability, policymakers can help ensure that rural communities have access to safe, affordable, and sustainable housing options.
In conclusion, the findings of this study provide valuable insights into the factors contributing to housing instability in rural Iran. By highlighting the perspectives of local experts and rural elites, the research underscores the importance of addressing both economic and institutional challenges to improve housing stability. The recommendations provided in this study can serve as a basis for developing targeted interventions to support rural housing development and enhance the quality of life for rural residents. Future research should continue to explore the dynamics of rural housing and the effectiveness of different policy interventions in promoting sustainable development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • development
  • rural housing
  • analysis
  • factors of instability
  • villages on the margins of Flowerjan River- Isfahan
بذرافشان، جواد، شایان، محسن، بازوند، سجاد(1394). ارزیابی عوامل تاثرگذار پایداری مسکن در مناطق روستایی شهرستان زرین دشت، جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی، 41، 62- 59 . https:/ ensani.ir/fa/article/381052
بسحاقی، محمد رضا، تقدیسی، احمد، امرایی، علی اقا، دانش، کمال(1395). تحلیل بر نقش عوامل موثر بر پایداری مسکن در مناطق روستایی ایران (مطالعه موردی: دهستان ملاوی شهرستان پلدختر)، مسکن و محیط روستا، 154،125- 134.  http://jhre.ir/article-1-449-fa.html
خاکزاده، محمد رضا، منصوری، بهروز، ستاری ساربانقلی، حسن(1401). بررسی عناصر و عوامل تاثیرگذار بر مسکن پایدار روستایی در پهنه کوهستانی، برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 47 ، 292- 304.      https://doi.org/10.30495/jzpm.2022.5418
رکن‌الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا، حاجی‌پور، مجتبی، فتاحی، احد‌الله، پایدار کل سنگ، ابوذر (1391). بررسی میزان انطباق ساخت و سازهای جدید در نواحی روستایی با معماری بومی و میزان رضایت‌مندی ساکنین روستایی نمونه موردی: بخش مرکزی شهرستان دلفان، مسکن و محیط روستا، 139، 85- 98. www. Sid. ir/paper/186206/fa
رومیانی، احمد، سجاسی قیداری، حمد‌الله، منصوری، خیر‌النساء( 1397 ). تحلیل ساختاری– کارکردی مسکن روستایی با رویکرد توسعه پایدار (مطالعه موردی : دهستان رومشگان شرقی شهرستان کوهدشت)، مسکن و محیط روستا، 162، 55- 70.  https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/paper-abstract-1071783.html
سالاروند، اسماعیل(1390). سنجش و ارزیابی شاخص‌های مسکن پایدار روستایی ( نمونه موردی: روستاهای قلعه رستم، تیان و میانرودان دهستان سیلاخور شرقی)، دانشگاه مدرس، استاد راهنما مهدی پور طاهری، پایان‌نامه برای دریافت درجه کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی، تهران.
مشکینی، ابوالفضل، ملکی، سعید، شاهرخی‌فر، زینب، و ملایی قلعه محمد، سجاد. ( 1397 ). ارزیابی تغییرات سلسله مراتبی شهرستان های استان کرماشاه از نظر شاخص‌های جمعیتی مسکن در دوره‌های سرشماری 1375 تا 1395، مطالعات و عمران شهری، 7 ، 93- 108. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/398658
 
References
Bashaghi, M. R., Taghdisi, A., Amrai, A. A., & Danesh, K. (2015). Analysis of the role of factors affecting the sustainability of housing in rural areas of Iran (case study: Melawi village, Poldakhtar city). Housing and Village Environment, 134, 125-154. http://jhre.ir/article-1-449-fa.html [In Persian]
Bazarafshan, J., Shayan, M., & Bazond, S. (2014). Evaluation of influencing factors of housing sustainability in rural areas of Zarin Dasht. Geography and Planning, 41, 59-62. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/381052 [In Persian]
Danbil. H.; Joe. M and Gao, Lu (2005)."Achievements and Challenges:30 Years of Housing Reforms in the People's Republic of China". Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series No. 198. doi:10/2139/ SSM, 1619161. SSRN. 161961
Danso, H (2018). Dimensions and indicators for sustainable construction materials: a review. Research and Development in Material Science, 3(4): 1-9. Doi: 10.31031/ RDMS.2018.03.000568
Giannetti, B. F; Demétrio, J. C; Agostinho, F; Almeida, C. M & Liu, G (2018). Towards, more sustainable social housing projects: Recognizing the importance of using local resources. Recognizing the mportance of using local resources, Building and Environment, 127, 203- 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.033.
Haque, M. O., Munzarin, B. U. T., & Saikia, S (2020). Implementation of Alternative Affordable Materials in Sustainable Rural Housing Design. Guwahati, University of Melbourne.
Hulchanski, J. D., & Shapcott, M. (Eds.) (2004). Finding room: Options for a Canadian rental housing strategy. Centre for Urban & Community Stds
Ibrahim, I. A. Sustainable housing development: role and significance of satisfaction aspect. City Territ Archit 7, 21 (2020).‏ Https:// cityterritoryarchitecture. Springeropen. Com/articles/ 10.1186/s40410-020-00130-x
Khakzadeh, M. R., Mansouri, B., & Satari Sarbangali, H. (2022). Investigating the elements and factors affecting sustainable rural housing in the mountainous area. Regional Planning, 47, 292-304. https://doi.org/10.30495/jzpm.2022.5418 [In Persian]
Meshkini, A., Maliki, S., Shahrokhifar, Z., & Molai Qala Mohammad, S. (2017). Evaluation of hierarchical changes in the cities of Kermashah province in terms of housing population indicators in the census periods 1375 to 1395. Studies and Urban Development, 7, 93-108. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/398658 [In Persian]
Mlecnik, E (2013). Innovation Development for Highly Energy-Efficient Housing, Delft University Press.
Peer Smets & Paul van Lindert. (2016). International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, dol :10.1080/19463138.2016.1168825: 1-9.
Rangwala, S.C (1998). Town Planning, Charatar Publishing House, India.
Ruknuddin Eftekhari, A. R., Hajipour, M., Fatahi, A., & Padaydar Kol Seng, A. D. (2011). Examining the degree of conformity of new constructions in rural areas with native architecture and the degree of satisfaction of rural residents (case study: the central part of Delfan city). Village Housing and Environment, 139, 85-98. http://www.sid.ir/paper/186206/fa [In Persian]
Rumiani, A., Sejasi Khedari, H., & Mansouri, K. A. N. (2017). Structural-functional analysis of rural housing with a sustainable development approach (case study: East Rumshgan village of Kohdasht city). Housing and Village Environment, 162, 55-70. https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/paper-abstract-1071783.html [In Persian]
Salarond, I. (2011). Measurement and evaluation of sustainable rural housing indicators (case example: Qala Rostam, Tian, and Mianrodan villages of Eastern Silakhor district) [Master’s thesis, University of Modares]. Tehran. [In Persian]
Tahmasbi Moghadam, H., Ahadnejad Roshti, M., & Timuri, A. (2019). Spatial analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of housing in urban areas with a sustainable housing approach (case study: Zanjan city). Urban Social Geography, 1(16), 255-271. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.26457784.1399.7.1.13.9 [In Persian]
Un Habitat (2012). Sustainable Housing for Sustainable Cities, A policy Framework For Developing Contries.
Weber, M. J., Mccray, J., & Ha, M (1993). Housing assessment criteria of rural households. Social Indicators Research, 28(1): 21-43.‏ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01086715
Wong, S. Y., Low, W. W., Wong, K. S., & Kan, F. K (2022, October). Sustainable Rural Housing Development in Sarawak: A Preliminary Conceptual Framework. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science ,1067( 1): : 012078). IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1067/1/ 012078
zolfani, S. H., & Zavadskas, E. K (2013). Sustainable development of rural areas’ building structures based on local climate. Procedia Engineering, 57:1301- 1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.163
Zumaya, J. Q., & Motlak, J. B (2021 (. Sustainable Housing Indicators and Improving the Quality of Life: The Case of Two Residential Areas in Baghdad City. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science , 754( 1): 012002. doi 10.1088/1755-1315/754/1/012002