اولویت بندی فعالیت های اقتصادی فضا در راستای توسعه پایدار روستایی (مورد مطالعه: روستاهای شهرستان قوچان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران

چکیده

سیاست های توسعه ای لزوماً به دلیل طیف گسترده ای از شرایط خاص در سطوح منطقه ای و محلی بایستی مورد توجه قرار گیرد. برخی فعالیت های اقتصادی بایستی بیشتر سازگار شود تا چشم اندازهای توسعه پایدار را با مقیاس های منطقه ای و محلی از جمله مناطق روستایی مطابقت داشته باشد. از این رو رضایتمندی فعالیت های منطقه ای در گرو دستیابی به نیازهای واقعی هر منطقه شکل خواهد گرفت. بدین منظور در این مطالعه، چهار گروه عمده از فعالیت های اقتصادی در شهرستان قوچان با ارزیابی از افراد ذینفع به عنوان گزینه های تصمیم گیری انتخاب گردید. سه معیار ثبات درامدی برای پایداری اقتصادی، پایداری زیست محیطی و گستردگی و شبکه ای بودن فعالیت ها جهت پایداری اجتماعی تعیین گردید. با انجام تحقیق به روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی در محیط فازی بیشترین وزن به معیار پایداری درامدی اختصاص یافت و شاخص های پایداری محیط زیست و پایداری اجتماعی به ترتیب در رتبه های بعدی قرار گرفته است. نهایتا فعالیت صنایع تبدیلی انگور به شیوه صنعتی در اولویت اول فعالیت پایدار منطقه قرار گرفت درحالی که به ترتیب فعالیتهای تولیدات لبنی، تولید گیاهان دارویی و گردشگری طبیعی بعدی قرار دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prioritization of spatial economic activities to enhance sustainable rural development (Case study: villages of Quchan County)

نویسنده [English]

  • zahara shirzouraliabadi
Assistant Professor, of Management,, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Birjand, Birjand,, Iran
چکیده [English]

Developmental policies need to be addressed at regional and local levels due to a wide range of specific conditions. Some economic activities have to be changed to make prospects of sustainable development match regional and local criteria, for example in rural areas. Therefore, the suitability of regional activities depends on determining the actual needs of each region. In this study, four main categories of economic activities in Quchan were selected via eliciting the views of the stakeholders as decision-makers. Three criteria, i.e. income stability for economic stability, environmental stability, and extent and networking of activities, were identified for social stability. Having conducted the research based on fuzzy hierarchical analysis, the highest weight was assigned to income stability followed by indices of environmental stability and social stability. Finally, the activities related to industrial grape conversion were ranked as the first priority for stable activities in the region, while dairy products industries, production of medicinal plants, and ecotourism occupied the next priorities respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • hierarchical analysis
  • sustainable rural development
  • economic activities

مراجع

  • Ahmad, S., & Tahar, R. M. (2014). Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia. Renewable energy, 63, 458-466.
  • Baffoe, G., & Matsuda, H. (2017a). Why do rural people do what they do in the context of livelihood activities? Exploring the Livelihood Viability and Priority Nexus. Community Development, 48(5), 715–734.
  • Ballı, S.; Korukog˘ lu, S. Operating system selection using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Math. Compute. Appl. 2009, 14, 119–130. [CrossRef]
  • Dos Santos, P. H., Neves, S. M., Sant’Anna, D. O., de Oliveira, C. H., & Carvalho, H. D. (2019). The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of cleaner production, 212, 119-138.
  • Ghambarali, R., Alibaygi, G., Rasekhi, B., Pezeshki, V., Ghasemi, S., & Akbari, Z. (2013). Challenges of sustainable rural development from perspective villagers. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 7(5), 253-258.
  • Huang, C.-C.; Chu, P.-Y.; Chiang, Y.-H. A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega 2008, 36, 1038–1052.
  • Ikejemba, E. C. X., Mpuan, P. B., Schuur, P. C., & Hillegersberg, J. V. (2016b). Failures and generic recommendations towards the sustainable management of renewable energy projects in sub-Sahara Africa (part 2 of 2). Renewable Energy, 113: 639-647.
  • Kaur, P.; Chakraborty, S. A new approach to vendor selection problem with impact factor as an indirect measure of quality. J. Mod. Math. Stat. 2007, 1, 8–14.
  • Kim, J. A. (2003). Sustainable Development and the CDM: A South African Case Study. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, pp.1–18.
  • Kubler, S.; Robert, J.; Derigent, W.; Voisin, A.; Le Traon, Y. A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 2016, 65, 398–422.
  • Lespier, L.P.; Long, S.; Shoberg, T.; Corns, S. A model for the evaluation of environmental impact indicators for a sustainable maritime transportation system. Front. Eng. Manag. 2019, 6, 368–383. [CrossRef]
  • Melles, G. (2018). Sustainable community development or voluntourism: Sustainable housing in rural Maharashtra. Social Sciences, 7(12), 247
  • Nori, H., & MiniFaskhodi, A. (2008). The share of agricultural development in rural development (a case study of rural areas). Journal of Agricultural Science, 2-38 (2), 263-275.
  • Pade, C. I., Mallinson, B., & Sewry, D. (2006, October). An exploration of the categories associated with ICT project sustainability in rural areas of developing countries: A case study of the Dwesa project. In Proceedings of the 2006 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries (pp. 100-106).
  • Petrini, M. A., Rocha, J. V., & Brown, J. C. (2016). Using an analytic hierarchy process approach to prioritize public policies addressing family farming in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 51, 85–94.
  • Pimoljinda, T., & Siriprasertchok, R. (2017). Failure of public participation for sustainable development: A case study of a NGO's development projects in Chonburi province. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 331-336.
  • Putra, D., Sobandi, M., Andryana, S., & Gunaryati, A. (2018). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method to determine the quality of gemstones. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2018.
  • Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980.
  • Sabaghi, M.; Mascle, C.; Baptiste, P.; Rostamzadeh, R. Sustainability assessment using fuzzy-inference technique (SAFT): A methodology toward green products. Expert Syst. Appl. 2016, 56, 69–79. [CrossRef]
  • Shepherd, A. (1998). Sustainable rural development. Macmillan International Higher Education.
  • Shukla, R.K.; Garg, D.; Agarwal, A. An integrated approach of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS in modeling supply chain coordination. Prod. Manuf. Res. 2014, 2, 415–437. [CrossRef]
  • Sun, C.-C. A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37, 7745–7754. [CrossRef]
  • Suvedi M.2010. Building Capacity for Sustainable Rural Development: Lessons from Nepal, International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development (2010) (1)188-193.
  • Szopik-Depczyńska, K., Cheba, K., Bąk, I., Stajniak, M., Simboli, A., & Ioppolo, G. (2018). The study of relationship in a hierarchical structure of EU sustainable development indicators. Ecological indicators, 90, 120-131.
  • WCED, (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/milestones/wced

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 15 دی 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 03 اسفند 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 18 اسفند 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار